debates

I have problems with both the defenders of the reservation system and its opponents. Partly because whenever disputes exists the disputants disagree with the premisses, or the hypotheses, each group is advancing in order to account for some phenomena. So far so good when the problem concerns with only premisses (hypotheses). But unlike the previous generations, we should rather look forward to examining the phenomena. Our problems lie there. Otherwise, both parties talk past each other, making the opponents a bunch of stupids which they are not.